But how do we set about achieving both the
introspection and the active control of the brain?
Both assume a state of awareness, i.e. a contact with
beingness. Of course, one can say that the role of control can
be also given to a part of the brain, e.g. the frontal lobes,
but on the psychological level these could be also controlled.
If the psychological level is closely related with the physical
brain, then how can we act from the psychological level towards
the physical level ? It is proved that there is no one-to-one
correspondence between the brain- machine and its psychological
activity. If we accept that a mental "software" has
roots in a concrete substance, then we have to come back to the
close relationship of it with the machine. But we know that this
cannot be proved experimentally. Then we conclude that such a
substance must exist in a new form, i.e. the mental field. The
psychological activity could then be an interaction between the
brain and its mental field.
To try a possibility for clarifying this problem
we take the most general model that we could have about the brain
as a material device (Fig. 22) within the philosophical conception
of this book. For such a model there is no need for a one-to-one
correspondence between the psychological level and the underlayer
of the nervous system, since the mental field can also play some
role into this. To what extend a portion of the brain can control,
and finally know, an other, i.e. to what extend a part of what
is represented in Fig. 22 can introspect and know an other, remains
to be proved. The problem of brain knowing the brain is fundamental
in neurobiology. However, lets remember the results of automaton
theory and of algorithms theory showing that an automaton (algorithm)
can not describe and know an other, but of a lower class, and
the we shall question the possibility of a human brain being able
to know an other human brain. However, the human brain is not
studied by an other human brain, but by a collectivity of human
brains, and that changes the general conditions of the problem,
leaving open our possibility of knowing the human brain. To-date
we do not know how certain is the possibility of controlling the
functioning of a certain part of the substance-brain by the psychological
level via a mental field. And regarding the mental field we should
notice that if it is supposed to be of informatter nature, then
the coupling of the latter with the brain should be done at the
level at which the informatter, as a profound matter, can be easily
accessible, i.e. starting with the quantic level towards more
profound states. Hence the connection with informatter should
be searched from the molecular level of the structures constituting
the brain.
Fig. 22
Certain experimental data could come towardsthe aforementioned ideas. Thus H.
H. Kornbuter83
observes that the conscious will triggers a negative potential
in the upper part of the brain, on both sides, about 0.8 sec.
before a massive brain activity is developed. The interaction
between consciousness and brain seems to require a certain time
until the cortex is electrically ready for its action, e.g. for
obtaining a voluntary action. The experiment does not exclude
the possibility of this voluntary initial electric discharge taking
place in a limited area of the brain, i.e. retaining to a restricted
zone the connection between psychologic and physiologic.
The mathematical study of EEG waves performed
by factorial analysis on electronic computers, showed new aspectsregarding
brain behavior. Gray Walter et
al.84 observed certain
variations of the EEG waves under an intellectual stimulus, when
an information or an action is anticipated by the brain. This
variation, called CNV (contingent negative variation) or anticipation
waves, were extracted from the noise of neural activity byspecial
algorithms. These waves reflect a preparation ofthe brain for coming
tasks. E. Roy John et
al.85,
also mathematically processed the EEG waves and showed certain
shapes reflecting the brain behavior under a stimulus and interpreted
the meaning of it.
Other techniques consist of following neuronic
trajectories by implantation of microelectrodes or other techniques.
James Old from California Institute of
Technology86 examined the
response of a mouse brain to a sound signal via a number of microelectrodes.
A new signal diffuses in the whole brain. In 1-2 milisec. the
signal goes from one neuron to the other, in about 100-200 milisec.
the mouse reacts. The phenomenon of signal diffusion is describedby James Old
as follows87:
at the initial moment No. 1 there is something at the receptor;
at moment No. 2, one millisecond later, there is something larger;
at moment No. 3, even larger. At moments No.4, 5 and 6, it covers
almost the whole brain. Even if not all the neurons are implied,
fragments of the signal can be found almost everywhere. Then it
starts converging towards an effector and it ceases to exist.
When the signal is repeated, i.e. the brain
is subject to a learning process, the brain signals are channelled
with priority onto certain paths, although they continue to be
diffused in the whole brain. Learning modifies the way in which
signals are channelled into the brain. The presence of electric
impulses into the brain produces a "combinatorial explosion"
thus making difficult the exact comparison of the brain with an
electronic computer; or such a computer representing the brain
should be understood and modelled differently than the present
day computers. The brain has a high flexibility, certain functions
can be taken over by new regions if the typical regions are damaged.
However, one should not understand that the combinatorial explosion
would negate or destroy the information-machine patterns.
On the contrary, these are carried by the combinatorial explosion
into the whole brain, thus making even more difficult the understanding
of how this device works. The brain works in a more complex manner
than the computer and according to Jack D.
Cowan88 (Biophysics Professor
at Chicago University), the difference is so great that the methods
used in the study of computers and of artificial intelligence
are insufficient for understanding the brain-machine. To understand
the brain one needs new avenues of attack, new concepts, new mathematicalmodels.
In his opinion89
one can determine how a dozen or a hundred neurons interact, but
it is a large jump from here to tens of thousands, or millions,
or billions. For him, the only mode known to make this jump is
through mathematics.
Cowan wants to use the mathematical modelling
to understand the integrative activity of the brain, especially
by determining the configurations specified in the neuronic networks.
Other new techniques for the physical study
of the brain were developed lately. Louis E. Sokoloff from the
US National Institute of Mental
Health90 uses a chemical substance
(2-deoxiglucose) that passes from the bloodstream to feed especially
the activated neurons. This technique developed in 1975 bears
the name of Sokoloff. Containing radioactive carbon, this substance
allows to trace the trajectories of the activated neurons.
Biology and Psychology in Relation with Awareness
65